• Empire
  • Posts
  • 🤨 Based content

🤨 Based content

Jesse Pollak lays out the case for content coins

Brought to you by:

Yuga Labs is asking a court to order Jeremy Cahan to turn over some crypto wallets in its case against Cahan and artist Ryder Ripps. (You may remember the dispute from 2022.) 

A court sided with Yuga, handing down a multimillion-dollar judgment. Per a court document from Monday, the total balance is over $9 million. Woof. 

It looks like there’s an ā€œinformal discovery conferenceā€ set for April 28,  according to a separate court document so we’ll see how this plays out.

Meanwhile:

  • Bitcoin’s ripping and roaring back above $93,000, a 5.8% increase over the past day.

  • Base is for everyone’s market cap is down to $5 million, according to Zora

  • DEX volume’s up 28% in the last 24 hours to $10 billion, per Blockworks Research.

šŸŽ° Risk vs. reward

Since last week, Base’s Jesse Pollak has been very busy posting about content coins and prompting folks in his replies to coin everything, though that’s come with some mixed results. 

Before we get into Pollak’s bullish thought process, I asked him about the now-deleted post promoting an image of a girl from Hinge being coined. The image was a screenshot taken from the dating site, and it’s unclear if the girl consented to the image being not only used on social media but also being put onchain. Even if consent was given, however, it’s against Hinge’s terms of service.

ā€œI want to clearly apologize for this post. I shouldn’t have posted it or amplified it. I heard the feedback loud and clear, which is why I quickly apologized and deleted the post,ā€ he explained. 

For Pollak, this process has required a learning curve in real time. He told me the goal was to experiment in public and lead by example, hence Base’s launch of ā€œBase is for everyoneā€ last week. He added that he was prepared for some backlash, but he's hyper-focused on bringing a billion folks onchain, which will require some trial and error.

ā€œThat said, in retrospect, one thing I would have done differently is added more context to the Base handle initial post. I had been talking about this for a few weeks on my personal handle, and we included a disclaimer on the Zora post itself, but it wasn’t enough. We could have done more here,ā€ he said.

While oversaturation is a concern I’ve heard from folks around the industry, Pollak dismissed it. 

ā€œThe truth is that you want basically infinite content, because that lets you sort and filter through to find the world-class stuff,ā€ he said. ā€œOne of the reasons I am continually coining content is to lead by example here. If this is a normal, everyday thing, then the expectations around each individual piece of content are also normalized.ā€

As for the great debate of content coins vs. memecoins, Pollak says that the expectations for memecoins are centered around the overall value and curating a community. On the other hand, ā€œpeople should have no expectations around the value or utility of any single content coin,ā€ in Pollak’s opinion. 

ā€œA content coin is a singular piece of content, and the market is free to decide on the value of that content,ā€ he added, citing a bowl of granola he coined that has a current value of $3,500. 

ā€œI’m not doing anything to create a community around this piece of content. I’m not promoting it over the long term, I’m not making a Telegram group, and I’m not turning my photo of granola into a project with ongoing support. I’m just coining a photo of my granola, and then moving on to something else.ā€

Pollak dismissed the criticism around Base leaning into Zora, noting that Base has been ā€œcontinually posting on Zora for two years.ā€ 

ā€œNo one from the Zora team knew about the ā€˜Base is for everyone’ post in advance, and this was not a coordinated marketing effort,ā€ he explained.

Brought to you by:

Arkham is a crypto exchange and a blockchain analytics platform that lets you look inside the wallets of the best crypto traders — and then act on that information.

Arkham’s Intel Platform has a suite of features including real-time alerts, customizable dashboards, a transaction visualization tool, and advanced transaction filtering — all of which is accessible on all major blockchain networks, and completely free.

Arkham’s main product is the exchange, where users can express their trade ideas against the market.

  • Cantor, SoftBank, Tether and Bitfinex are teaming up to create a multibillion-dollar bitcoin acquisition vehicle, per a report from the Financial Times. 

  • The SEC isn’t giving a free pass for crime: The regulator’s going after a crypto executive for an alleged fraud scheme

  • Who’s at Grayscale’s helm nowadays? A look at its new-ish CEO.

ā›“ļø Bring ā€˜em all onchain

There were some other tidbits from Pollak that I wanted to cover, so we’re going to continue the conversation. 

Specifically, I wanted to hone in on the potential for content coins to generate more value for Base, and the idea that maybe this is Base’s solution to pump.fun, the infamous Solana memecoin platform. 

ā€œI have a lot of respect for the Solana team – they’ve done a lot to onboard people into crypto, and I’m glad to see that. We’re looking to grow the pie, not just compete for the existing pie,ā€ Pollak said. ā€œYou don’t need to understand anything about crypto or the underlying infrastructure to post on Zora. Creators can just post their content, start earning, and experience the benefits of onchain social firsthand.ā€

One thing that I’ve struggled with is the audience for content coins. Pollak, being as bullish as he is, thinks this is a broad way to onboard folks. 

He breaks the consumers into two buckets: The first are collectors engaging with content coins for fun and looking to earn a participation trophy for being onchain. Then there are the traders who aim to utilize this newer segment to turn a profit. We’ve clearly seen the rise of the latter thanks to memecoins, but it feels as though the former has been adrift for a while, at least since the popularity of NFTs dropped off. 

ā€œWe think content coins can help all three segments: creators, collectors, and traders by bringing more content and value onchain,ā€ he explained. 

As with all of crypto, the big test will be how long the hype lasts. Memecoins, despite their success, couldn’t even withstand the changing tides. While there’s a decent possibility of success, I’m always wary of the fickle approach crypto takes to narratives.

It’s a builders market. It will always be a builders market. 

36 hours of pure output. The Permissionless Hackathon, powered by Cracked Labs, is where devs go heads down to ship.

Deployments. Not ideas — code in prod.

šŸ’»$100K+ in bounties

June 22–23 | Brooklyn

On our minds: Content coins

I’m of two minds here. 

First (and this was my gut reaction), I wonder if we really need another segment that lacks inherent utility. And, like I wrote above, is this something that lasts? You all know my background prior to crypto. So you know I’m a big fan of things like fundamentals that can help better gauge value. 

But the other part of me says I’m holding content coins to an unfair expectation. There are real tokens and projects that are pushing crypto forward — content coins shouldn’t be mixed in with them.

Pollak’s made me wonder if content coins could act as crypto’s social media moment (at first I typed TikTok moment, but I don’t think we’re there yet). If we pull back the expectations and let the content speak for itself, I can see a scenario where content coins have a memecoin moment without the volatility. 

And, honestly, things like content coins do push crypto forward. Personally, I’ve found the discourse around the viability and usability to be really enlightening — not to mention, it feels like it’s been a while since I’ve seen such a variety of takes. 

That’s not to say I support some of the controversial things that have happened, such as promoting or coining the aforementioned Hinge screenshot, but that’s a whole other discussion I’m happy to have at some point.

Like Katherine, I’m of two minds as well.

On the one hand, I’m all for carving out new, weird use cases for tokens. Whether ā€œcontent coinsā€ will prove to have lasting power or be another flash-in-the-pan CT topic remains to be seen. The folks over at Base obviously have an incentive to see the former outcome realized, so heavy tweeting to that effect (see Katherine’s piece above) is all but guaranteed.

That said, I’m a touch dubious about the notion that content coins will somehow avoid what I like to call speculative destruction, the sort of which tends to send most coins, tokens, etc. to the dustbin soon after they pop. 

I think people will develop speculative expectations around a prospective successful content coin because that’s simply what happens in crypto. It’s inherently a speculative game. Always has been. I don’t think some kind of special immunity to those market forces will be conferred because someone came up with a new mode of thinking (though I’m happy to be wrong, as always).

I think if someone creates a content coin and people find a reason to speculate on it, the typical crypto market forces will almost certainly follow — especially if someone with some cash to burn sees a way to make money off whichever narrative surrounds that coin.